?!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> 香蕉久久久久久av成人,亚洲国产精品久久久久秋霞1,网曝黑料国产吃瓜

亚洲精品92内射,午夜福利院在线观看免费 ,亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线视色,亚洲国产欧美国产综合在线,亚洲国产精品综合久久2007

?div class="header_top">
Java知识分n|?- L学习从此开始!    
SpringBoot+SpringSecurity+Vue+ElementPlus权限pȝ实战评 震撼发布        

最新Java全栈׃实战评(免费)

AI人工学习大礼?/h2>

IDEA怹Ȁz?/h2>

66套java实战评无套路领?/h2>

锋哥开始收Java学员啦!

Python学习路线?/h2>

锋哥开始收Java学员啦!

Learning TypeScript PDF 下蝲


旉:2024-09-02 10:00来源:http://www.sh6999.cn 作?转蝲  侉|举报
Learning TypeScript
失效链接处理
Learning TypeScript PDF 下蝲

 
 
相关截图Q?/strong>
 


主要内容Q?/strong>

Freedom Through Restriction
TypeScript allows us to specify what types of values may be provided for parameters
and variables. Some developers find having to explicitly write out in your code how
particular areas are supposed to work to be restrictive at first.
But! I would argue that being “restricted” in this way is actually a good thing! By
restricting our code to only being able to be used in the ways you specify, TypeScript
can give you confidence that changes in one area of code won’t break other areas of
code that use it.
If, say, you change the number of required parameters for a function, TypeScript will
let you know if you forget to update a place that calls the function.
In the following example, sayMyName was changed from taking in two parameters
to taking one parameter, but the call to it with two strings wasn’t updated and so is
triggering a TypeScript complaint:
 

 
------分隔U?---------------------------
?!-- //底部模板 -->